Time for truth…

Im decompressing this morning….enjoying a smoke and a cup of coffee at my favorite table to write at over at Harrys… I have much to say about my court battle yesterday…Trust me…its coming….i just need to settle in with my laptop and it will flow like water…be patient readers…i promise a world of fun!

Tarvin apparently yanked her bullshit “defamation” suit…no matter…shes still going to pay my attorneys fees…

And if Ms. Clayton -Tarvin thinks thats the end of this…think again Gina. Im in discussions with a gentleman who worked in the DAs office for 20+ years and identified the elements of perjury in your filing and offered me a knowing smile. Then comes comes malicious prosecution. Then we move on to a “real” defamation case, before closing with a intentional infliction of emotional distress.

I think its time for truth Gina. All the crocodile tears in the world won’t save you now….lawyer up bitch.

HBSledgehammer University: Online Syllabus-ETHICS 104 – SLAPP Lawsuits.

Welcome to HBSledgehammer University:

Online Education. ETHICS 104- SLAPP Lawsuits.

Professor: Miss Smith. 714-536-9303 email: mssmith@HBsledgehammer.edu


We have prepared this syllabus for your use.

In this class, we will cover the fundamentals of what constitutes a SLAPP Lawsuit.


Next we will cover why SLAPP Suits are filed Including:

  • Attempts to silence political critics
  • Attempts to intimidate political critics
  • Confusion over the intent or direction of a statement.
  • Inability of a public figure or business to accept the fact that they are disliked
  • Inability of a public figure or business to effectively accept open criticism
  • Paranoia
  • Mental Illness
  • Being a total asshole
  • And Finally, Bat Shit Craziness

The class will then review important case law pertaining to SLAPP suits including:

  • HUSTLER MAGAZINE, INC. V. FALWELL 485 U.S. 46 (1988)
  • Scott v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation (1974) 37 Cal.App.3d 277, 288.
  • Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. v. Paladino (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 294, 308.
  • Barrett v. Rosenthal, 40 Cal. 4th 33, 41 n.4 (2006
  • Ampex v. Cargle, 128 Cal. App. 4th 1569, 1576 (2005)
  • Franklin v. Dynamic Details, Inc. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 375, 385. 
  • Chaker v. Mateo (2012) 209 CA4th 1138, 1148.
  • Ghafur v. Bernstein (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 1230,1238.

Finally, we will cover ANTI SLAPP law Including:

  • The severe financial consequences of filing a bogus lawsuit
  • The embarrassment of having your ass handed to you in open court
  • The potential for the intended “Victim” of your SLAPP suit to mock you mercilessly
  • The feeling of abject failure resulting from having your SLAPP suit tossed by a Judge within minutes of reading the complaint.
  • And a recap of the additional fees and costs that the Plaintiff will pay as a result of a gleeful attorney for the defendant taking the case on contingency.


I’ve got you under my wheels…


The Feb 14th, 2018, Parkland school shooting tragedy, spawned an entire spectrum of media whores, clambering over the backs of the dead victims, fighting for face time and an opportunity to shove their progressive views down the throats of anybody within a earshot of a television or a smartphone.

On a local level, Gina Clayton-Tarvin was first out of the gate.


HBSledgehammer.com recently released a post, regarding Gina Clayton-Tarvin, and her use of the Parkland shooting tragedy, to advance her political agenda, regarding 2nd amendment restrictions. Tarvin apparently took Rahm Emmanuel’s mantra ..” Never let a good crisis go to waste”, to heart.

The piece, entitled “Standing Tall on the Backs of the Dead”, garnered unprecedented attention and interest, as far as interest in this blog goes.

Despite her best attempts Tarvin couldn’t match the obnoxious media presence of David Hogg, who grabbed his 15 minutes of fame and turned it into an endless stream of fucking rants…this kid is an indoctrinated tool.

His cohort and fellow media whore, Emma Gonzalez gets in on the act… shes not quite as obnoxious as Hogg, but still brings to mind fingernails on a chalkboard or a dental drill.

One of the saddest episodes was the Co-Opting of a local rally, supposedly “Non-Partisan” and “Organized by Kids…” by congressional candidates Harley Rouda, Hans Kierstead and Laura Oatman, who used the legacy of dead children to forward their own agendas and engaged in the usual progressive sloganeering… fucking pathetic.

” Don’t let a good crisis go to waste”?

Fuck You.

Have some respect for the dead and acknowledge that 50 percent of the Country… you know, those “Deplorable” Types…

Think you have elevated the concept of “Deplorable”, to an entirely new level.